24
PERGUNTAS & RESPOSTAS
RETINOPATIA DIABÉTICA - Novo Paradigma de Cuidados
21.
Nordwall M, Bojestig M, Arnqvist HJ, Ludvigsson J .Declining incidence
of severe retinopathy and persisting decrease of nephropathy in an unse-
lected population of Type 1 diabetes-the Linkoping Diabetes Complica-
tions Study. Diabetologia 2004 ;47:1266–1272.
22.
Pambianco G, Costacou T, Ellis D, Becker DJ, Klein R, Orchard TJ (2006)
The 30-year natural history of type 1 diabetes complications: the Pittsbur-
gh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications Study experience. Diabetes
2006 ; 55:1463–1469.
23.
Buxton MJ, Sculpher MJ, Ferguson BA, et al. Screening for treatable
diabetic retinopathy: a comparison of different methods. Diabet Med
1991;8:371–7.
24.
Harding SP, Broadbent DM, Neoh C, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of
photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threate-
ning eye diseases: the Liverpool eye study. BMJ 1995;311:1131–5.
25.
Kinyoun J, Barton F, Fisher M, Hubbard L, Aiello L, Ferris F 3rd: Detec-
tion of diabetic macular edema: Ophthalmoscopy versus photography:
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 5: the ETDRS
Research Group. Ophthalmology 96:746–750, 1989 [discussion 750-
751].
26.
Harding SP, Broadbent DM, Neoh C, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of
photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threate-
ning eye diseases: the Liverpool eye study. BMJ 1995;311:1131–5.
27.
Von Wendt G, Heikkila K, Summanen P: Detection of retinal neovas-
cularizations using 45 degrees and 60 degrees photographic fields with
varying 45 degrees fields simulated on a 60 degrees photograph. Acta
Ophthalmol Scand 80:372– 378, 2002.
28.
Von Wendt G, Ronnholm P, Heikkila K, Summanen P: A comparison
between one- and two-field 60 degree fundus photography when scree-
ning for diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78:14– 20, 2000.
29.
Stellingwerf C, Hardus PL, Hooymans JM: Two-field photography can
identify patientswith vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy: a screening
approach in the primary care setting. Diabetes Care 24:2086–2090, 2001
30.
Stellingwerf C, Hardus PL, Hooymans JM. Assessing diabetic retinopathy
using two-field digital photography and the influence of JPEG compres-
sion. Doc Ophthalmol 2004; 108: 203–209.
31.
Williams GA, Scott IU, Haller JA, Maguire AM, Marcus D, McDonald
HR: Single field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening:
a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology
111:1055–1062, 2004.
32.
Aoki N, Dunn K, MD « Fukui T , Beck JR, Schull WJ , Li HK. Cost-
-
Effectiveness Analysis of Telemedicine to Evaluate Diabetic Retinopathy
in a Prison Population Diabetes Care 27:1095–1101, 200.
33.
Whited JD, M.D., Datta SK , Aiello LM , Aiello LP , Jerry D. Cavalle-
rano JD, Conlin PR, Horton MB, Vigerski RA , Ronald K. Poropatich RK
Challa P, Darkins AW , Bursell S-E. A Modeled Economic Analysis of a
Digital Teleophthalmology System As Used by Three Federal Healthcare